Description Usage Arguments Details Value References See Also Examples
View source: R/test_performance.R
Testing whether models are "different" in terms of accuracy or explanatory power is a delicate and often complex
procedure, with many limitations and prerequisites. Moreover, many tests exist, each coming with its own interpretation, and set of strengths and weaknesses.
The test_performance()
function runs the most relevant and appropriate tests based on the type of input (for instance, whether the models are nested or not). However, it still requires the user to understand what the tests are and what they do in order to prevent their misinterpretation. See the details section for more information regarding the different tests and their interpretation.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  test_bf(...)
## Default S3 method:
test_bf(..., text_length = NULL)
test_likelihoodratio(..., estimator = "ML")
performance_lrt(..., estimator = "ML")
test_lrt(..., estimator = "ML")
test_performance(..., reference = 1)
test_vuong(...)
test_wald(...)

... 
Multiple model objects. 
text_length 
Numeric, length (number of chars) of output lines.

estimator 
Applied when comparing regression models using

reference 
This only applies when models are nonnested, and determines which model should be taken as a reference, against which all the other models are tested. 
Model's "nesting" is an important concept of models comparison. Indeed, many
tests only make sense when the models are "nested", i.e., when their
predictors are nested. This means that all the predictors of a model are
contained within the predictors of a larger model (sometimes referred to as
the encompassing model). For instance, model1 (y ~ x1 + x2)
is
"nested" within model2 (y ~ x1 + x2 + x3)
. Usually, people have a list
of nested models, for instance m1 (y ~ 1)
, m2 (y ~ x1)
,
m3 (y ~ x1 + x2)
, m4 (y ~ x1 + x2 + x3)
, and it is conventional
that they are "ordered" from the smallest to largest, but it is up to the
user to reverse the order from largest to smallest. The test then shows
whether a more parsimonious model, or whether adding a predictor, results in
a significant difference in the model's performance. In this case, models are
usually compared sequentially: m2 is tested against m1, m3 against m2,
m4 against m3, etc.
Two models are considered as "nonnested" if their predictors are
different. For instance, model1 (y ~ x1 + x2)
and 'model2 (y ~ x3
x4). In the case of nonnested models, all models are usually compared against the same *reference* model (by default, the first of the list). \cr\cr Nesting is detected via the
insight::is_nested_models()' function.
Note that, apart from the nesting, in order for the tests to be valid,
other requirements have often to be the fulfilled. For instance, outcome
variables (the response) must be the same. You cannot meaningfully test
whether apples are significantly different from oranges!
Bayes factor for Model Comparison  test_bf()
: If all
models were fit from the same data, the returned BF
shows the Bayes
Factor (see bayestestR::bayesfactor_models()
) for each model against
the reference model (which depends on whether the models are nested or
not). Check out
this vignette for more details.
Wald's FTest  test_wald()
: The Wald test is a rough
approximation of the Likelihood Ratio Test. However, it is more applicable
than the LRT: you can often run a Wald test in situations where no other
test can be run. Importantly, this test only makes statistical sense if the
models are nested.
Note: this test is also available in base R through the
anova()
function. It returns an Fvalue
column
as a statistic and its associated pvalue
.
Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT)  test_likelihoodratio()
:
The LRT tests which model is a better (more likely) explanation of the
data. LikelihoodRatioTest (LRT) gives usually somewhat close results (if
not equivalent) to the Wald test and, similarly, only makes sense for
nested models. However, Maximum likelihood tests make stronger assumptions
than method of moments tests like the Ftest, and in turn are more
efficient. Agresti (1990) suggests that you should use the LRT instead of
the Wald test for small sample sizes (under or about 30) or if the
parameters are large.
Note: for regression models, this is similar to
anova(..., test="LRT")
(on models) or lmtest::lrtest(...)
,
depending on the estimator
argument. For lavaan
models (SEM,
CFA), the function calls lavaan::lavTestLRT()
.
Vuong's Test  test_vuong()
: Vuong's (1989) test can
be used both for nested and nonnested models, and actually consists of two
tests.
The Test of Distinguishability (the Omega2
column and
its associated pvalue) indicates whether or not the models can possibly be
distinguished on the basis of the observed data. If its pvalue is
significant, it means the models are distinguishable.
The Robust Likelihood Test (the LR
column and its
associated pvalue) indicates whether each model fits better than the
reference model. If the models are nested, then the test works as a robust
LRT. The code for this function is adapted from the nonnest2
package, and all credit go to their authors.
A data frame containing the relevant indices.
Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and nonnested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307333.
Merkle, E. C., You, D., & Preacher, K. (2016). Testing nonnested structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 21, 151163.
compare_performance()
to compare
the performance indices of many different models.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71  # Nested Models
# 
m1 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Width, data = iris)
m2 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Width + Species, data = iris)
m3 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Width * Species, data = iris)
test_performance(m1, m2, m3)
test_bf(m1, m2, m3)
test_wald(m1, m2, m3) # Equivalent to anova(m1, m2, m3)
# Equivalent to lmtest::lrtest(m1, m2, m3)
test_likelihoodratio(m1, m2, m3, estimator = "ML")
# Equivalent to anova(m1, m2, m3, test='LRT')
test_likelihoodratio(m1, m2, m3, estimator = "OLS")
test_vuong(m1, m2, m3) # nonnest2::vuongtest(m1, m2, nested=TRUE)
# Nonnested Models
# 
m1 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Width, data = iris)
m2 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Length, data = iris)
m3 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species, data = iris)
test_performance(m1, m2, m3)
test_bf(m1, m2, m3)
test_vuong(m1, m2, m3) # nonnest2::vuongtest(m1, m2)
# Tweak the output
# 
test_performance(m1, m2, m3, include_formula = TRUE)
# SEM / CFA (lavaan objects)
# 
# Lavaan Models
if (require("lavaan")) {
structure < " visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3
textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6
speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9
visual ~~ textual + speed "
m1 < lavaan::cfa(structure, data = HolzingerSwineford1939)
structure < " visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3
textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6
speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9
visual ~~ 0 * textual + speed "
m2 < lavaan::cfa(structure, data = HolzingerSwineford1939)
structure < " visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3
textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6
speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9
visual ~~ 0 * textual + 0 * speed "
m3 < lavaan::cfa(structure, data = HolzingerSwineford1939)
test_likelihoodratio(m1, m2, m3)
# Different Model Types
# 
if (require("lme4") && require("mgcv")) {
m1 < lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Length + Species, data = iris)
m2 < lmer(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Length + (1  Species), data = iris)
m3 < gam(Sepal.Length ~ s(Petal.Length, by = Species) + Species, data = iris)
test_performance(m1, m2, m3)
}
}

Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.